From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Majestic Investors, Ltd. v. Lopez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1985
111 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

June 17, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.).


Order affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The note of issue in this action was filed by appellant in February 1979. The case reached the Day Calendar in October 1979, but was marked off due to the absence of appellant's former husband, who had died in December 1978. Appellant wife obtained letters of administration in 1981 and thereafter the lawsuit lay dormant until April 1984, when appellant moved, inter alia, to amend her answer and third-party amended answer. The moving papers proffered no excuse for the delay of over three years in moving to amend, contained an inadequate affidavit of merits, and failed to demonstrate a lack of prejudice to the other parties ( see, Warner v. Kudler, 101 A.D.2d 886). Mollen, P.J., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Majestic Investors, Ltd. v. Lopez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1985
111 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Majestic Investors, Ltd. v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:MAJESTIC INVESTORS, LTD., Plaintiff, v. AUGUSTINE LOPEZ, Appellant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 17, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

OneWest Bank FSB v. Koppelman

Defendant Koppelman's proffered excuse that "[she] did not have full knowledge of the many facts that are now…

Indymac Fed. Bank FSB v. Feffer

In this instance, it is noted that defendant's original verified answer is dated April 6, 2009. Defendant,…