From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mainzer v. Royal Cruises

Supreme Court, Appellate Term Second Department
May 20, 1998
177 Misc. 2d 553 (N.Y. App. Term 1998)

Opinion

May 20, 1998

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Allan Weiss, J.).

Scott A. Walker, New York City, for appellant.

Ronald Mainzer, respondent pro se.


MEMORANDUM.

Judgment unanimously reversed without costs and action dismissed.

Pro se plaintiff commenced the instant small claims action seeking $3,000 for defendants' alleged negligent four-day loss of one of plaintiff's pieces of luggage, and for poor service during a South American cruise. The court below found in favor of the plaintiff and awarded $1,300 for the four-day loss of plaintiff's luggage and for poor service. The court based the amount upon plaintiff's share of the price of the trip ($3,900) and gave plaintiff one third of the price for the four days of inconvenience.

It appears to be without question that State courts are bound to apply Federal maritime law in resolving disputes involving a maritime contract ( Matter of Rederi [Dow Chem. Co.], 25 N.Y.2d 576, 579). Because the passage ticket and contract clearly indicate that any actions must be brought in the courts of Athens, Greece, the matter should have been dismissed ( see, Effron v. Sun Line Cruises, 67 F.3d 7 [2d Cir. 1995]). Thus substantial justice mandates dismissal of the action (1807 Ct. Cl. Act).

KASSOFF, P.J., ARONIN and CHETTA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mainzer v. Royal Cruises

Supreme Court, Appellate Term Second Department
May 20, 1998
177 Misc. 2d 553 (N.Y. App. Term 1998)
Case details for

Mainzer v. Royal Cruises

Case Details

Full title:RONALD MAINZER, Respondent, v. ROYAL OLYMPIC CRUISES, LTD., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term Second Department

Date published: May 20, 1998

Citations

177 Misc. 2d 553 (N.Y. App. Term 1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 668

Citing Cases

Sitaras v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd. (Bahamas)

However, it is "without question that State Courts are bound to apply Federal Maritime Law in resolving…

In Matter of Dumont

Breach of Fiduciary Duty The bank was charged with upholding the terms of the trust: "In making investments…