Summary
holding that inmate conduct per se is not attributable to a prison
Summary of this case from Slayton v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Servs.Opinion
No. 97-6027.
September 30, 1997.
Appeal from the W.D.Okl.
Affirmed.
holding that inmate conduct per se is not attributable to a prison
Summary of this case from Slayton v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Servs.No. 97-6027.
September 30, 1997.
Appeal from the W.D.Okl.
Affirmed.
holding that inmate conduct per se is not attributable to a prison
Summary of this case from Slayton v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Servs.declining to attribute sexually offensive conduct to Defendant where the record demonstrated that it did discipline "many of the inmates in response to plaintiff's complaints"
Summary of this case from Akines v. Shelby County GovernmentIn Pflum, the taxpayer complained that the IRS summons issued to a financial institution did not fall within the collection exception of § 7609(c)(2)(D) because it sought testimony and data "`relating to the tax liability or the collection of the tax liability or for the purpose of inquiring into any offense connected with the administration or enforcement of the internal revenue laws,'" language identical to that in Form 2039 and thus to the summons issued to Chase Bank in this case.
Summary of this case from Holland v. U.S.In Maine v. Oklahoma Dep't of Corrections, 1997 WL 602688 (10th Cir. 1997), a plaintiff prison librarian was raped and assaulted by an inmate who had hidden under a library table.
Summary of this case from Stebner v. Utah Department of CorrectionsFull title:Maine v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Date published: Sep 30, 1997
The court finds that plaintiff has failed to submit the initial partial filing fee properly assessed in this…
Akines v. Shelby County GovernmentRegarding sexual harassment by the SCCC inmates, courts have consistently declined to impose sexual…