From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maine Acceptance Corp. v. Sheehan

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Penobscot County
Apr 11, 1930
149 A. 808 (Me. 1930)

Opinion

Decided April 11, 1930.

On exceptions. Plaintiff in replevin, assignee of a conditional sale contract, claimed title to an automobile held by defendant, a deputy sheriff, on attachment in favor of a creditor of the vendee. The sale was made on September 12, 1928, and the vendee took possession of the automobile on that day.

On September 15 the contract was recorded in the clerk's office of the city in which vendee resided. In the meantime, the automobile had been attached.

Sec. 8, Chap. 114, R. S. 1916, reads:

"No agreement that personal property bargained and delivered to another shall remain the property of the seller till paid for is valid unless the same is in writing and signed by the person to be bound thereby, and when so made and signed whether said agreement is or is called a note, lease, conditional sale, purchase on instalment, or by any other name, and in whatever form it may be, it shall not be valid except as between the original parties thereto unless it is recorded in the office of the clerk of the city, town or plantation organized for any purpose in which the purchaser resides at the time of the purchase."

An unrecorded conditional sale contract is not valid against an attaching creditor. Exceptions overruled.

S. Arthur Paul, George E. Thompson, for plaintiff.

Maxwell Conquest, for defendant.


Summaries of

Maine Acceptance Corp. v. Sheehan

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Penobscot County
Apr 11, 1930
149 A. 808 (Me. 1930)
Case details for

Maine Acceptance Corp. v. Sheehan

Case Details

Full title:MAINE ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION vs. J. FRED SHEEHAN

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Penobscot County

Date published: Apr 11, 1930

Citations

149 A. 808 (Me. 1930)
129 Me. 485

Citing Cases

Industrial Credit Company v. Cushing

" (Emphasis ours.) We distinguish Maine Acceptance Corp. v. Sheehan (1930) 129 Me. 485, 149 A. 833. In that…

In re Di Pierro

Gould v. Huff, 130 Me. 226, 154 A. 574; Mac Motor Sales, Inc., v. Pate, 148 Me. 72, 90 A.2d 460; Muskin v.…