From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mahoning Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Vivo

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 12, 2011
944 N.E.2d 1177 (Ohio 2011)

Opinion

No. 2011-0299.

April 12, 2011.


Disciplinary Case.

This cause is pending before the court upon the filing of a report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline.

Upon consideration of relator's motion to remand, it is ordered by the court that the motion to remand is granted. This matter is hereby remanded to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline for consideration of whether respondent, James Vivo, suffers from a medical condition that disabled him from responding to the allegations made against him before the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline and for further action that the board deems necessary and appropriate.


Summaries of

Mahoning Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Vivo

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 12, 2011
944 N.E.2d 1177 (Ohio 2011)
Case details for

Mahoning Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Vivo

Case Details

Full title:Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Vivo

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 12, 2011

Citations

944 N.E.2d 1177 (Ohio 2011)
128 Ohio St. 3d 1452
2011 Ohio 1750

Citing Cases

Trumbull Cnty. Bar Ass'n v. Ohlin

{¶ 7} Since deciding Portman, we have granted motions to remand for the introduction and consideration of…