From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mahmood v. Slahetka

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo
Mar 14, 2023
No. 07-23-00050-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 14, 2023)

Opinion

07-23-00050-CV

03-14-2023

MOHAMMMAD QUDDOOS MAHMOOD, APPELLANT v. AMANDA SUE SLAHETKA, APPELLEE


On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Williamson County, Texas Trial Court No. 19-3679-FC1, Honorable Daniel H. Mills, Presiding

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

In September 2022, Appellant, Mohammad Quddoos Mahmood, filed a petition to modify the parent-child relationship. His attorney later moved to withdraw as counsel and the trial court granted the motion. Mahmood, now proceeding pro se, appeals from the trial court's Order on Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 73.001.

Generally, appellate courts only have jurisdiction over final judgments that dispose of all pending parties and claims. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). We have jurisdiction to consider immediate appeals of interlocutory orders only if a statute explicitly provides appellate jurisdiction. Stary v. DeBord, 967 S.W.2d 352, 352- 53 (Tex. 1998). The trial court has not entered a final judgment in this case. And, an order granting a motion to withdraw of counsel is not an appealable interlocutory order. Davis v. Alcatel USA, Inc., No. 05-07-00060-CV, 2007 Tex.App. LEXIS 1079, at *1 (Tex. App.-Dallas Feb. 15, 2007, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (citing Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)).

By letter of February 8, 2023, we notified Mahmood that it did not appear that a final judgment or appealable order had been issued by the trial court and directed him to show how we have jurisdiction over this appeal. Mahmood has not filed a response or had any further communication with this Court to date.

Because Mahmood has not presented this Court with a final judgment or appealable order, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).


Summaries of

Mahmood v. Slahetka

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo
Mar 14, 2023
No. 07-23-00050-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Mahmood v. Slahetka

Case Details

Full title:MOHAMMMAD QUDDOOS MAHMOOD, APPELLANT v. AMANDA SUE SLAHETKA, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo

Date published: Mar 14, 2023

Citations

No. 07-23-00050-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 14, 2023)