From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mahlin v. GMAC Mortg. LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Nov 22, 2013
Civil No. 3:13-CV-906-M-BK (N.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2013)

Summary

finding the transaction test was met where a new cause of action was brought against foreclosure of the same property in a subsequent suit

Summary of this case from Garrison v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.

Opinion

Civil No. 3:13-CV-906-M-BK

11-22-2013

ROBERT G. MAHLIN, Plaintiff, v. GMAC MORTGAGE LLC, et al., Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 13) is DENIED, and the Motion to Dismiss Defendants Shelley Ortolani, Bob Lee, and Janae Urbanczyk (Doc. 20) is GRANTED.

____________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


Summaries of

Mahlin v. GMAC Mortg. LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Nov 22, 2013
Civil No. 3:13-CV-906-M-BK (N.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2013)

finding the transaction test was met where a new cause of action was brought against foreclosure of the same property in a subsequent suit

Summary of this case from Garrison v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Case details for

Mahlin v. GMAC Mortg. LLC

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT G. MAHLIN, Plaintiff, v. GMAC MORTGAGE LLC, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Nov 22, 2013

Citations

Civil No. 3:13-CV-906-M-BK (N.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2013)

Citing Cases

R&L Inv. Prop., LLC v. Green

Cantor v. Wachovia Mortg., FSB, 641 F. Supp. 2d 602, 611 (N.D. Tex. 2009) (Lynn, J.). While Plaintiff alleges…

Pharos Capital Group, LLC v. Nutmeg Insurance

Doc. 31, Pls.' Reply 9. 28 U.S.C. § 1447 specifically states that “a motion to remand on the basis of any…