From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maher v. U.S.

U.S.
Oct 6, 2003
540 U.S. 821 (2003)

Summary

holding that the government is not liable for breach of contract for lost compensation to officers and directors caused by FIRREA

Summary of this case from Franklin Federal Savings Bank v. U.S.

Opinion

No. 02-1783.

October 6, 2003.


C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 314 F. 3d 600.


Summaries of

Maher v. U.S.

U.S.
Oct 6, 2003
540 U.S. 821 (2003)

holding that the government is not liable for breach of contract for lost compensation to officers and directors caused by FIRREA

Summary of this case from Franklin Federal Savings Bank v. U.S.

defining a contract as "an exchange of promises — through commitments to act or refrain from acting in a specified way — that are evidenced in a writing or are inferable from conduct"

Summary of this case from Roberta v. U.S.
Case details for

Maher v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:MAHER ET AL. v. UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 6, 2003

Citations

540 U.S. 821 (2003)
124 S. Ct. 133

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Rudolph

I. Defendant initially argues that a lenient standard of "materiality" applies to pretrial disclosures under…

Roberta v. U.S.

Clearly, these words reflect an exchange that is promissory in character or, in other words, a contract.Maher…