From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maher v. Madison Square Garden Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 24, 1926
242 N.Y. 506 (N.Y. 1926)

Opinion

Argued January 18, 1926

Decided January 24, 1926

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Walter L. Glenney and Bertrand L. Pettigrew for appellant.

Leon Sanders and Walter E. Godfrey for respondent.


The evidence establishes that plaintiff's intestate, a boy fourteen years of age, was drowned in a swimming pool conducted for profit by the defendant. Though the swimming pool was crowded at the time, apparently no one saw the fatality. We know only that he was playing in the pool one afternoon and his dead body was found in another part of the pool the next morning, and that death was caused by asphyxiation. No inference can be drawn that by act or omission of the defendant or any of its employees the boy was placed in a position of danger which caused his death, or that any greater care by the defendant could have averted accident. The judgments should be reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts.

HISCOCK, Ch. J., POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ., concur; CARDOZO, J., absent.

Judgments reversed.


Summaries of

Maher v. Madison Square Garden Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 24, 1926
242 N.Y. 506 (N.Y. 1926)
Case details for

Maher v. Madison Square Garden Corporation

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET MAHER, as Administratrix of the Estate of PHILIP MAHER, Deceased…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 24, 1926

Citations

242 N.Y. 506 (N.Y. 1926)

Citing Cases

Wong v. Waterloo Community School District

Hecht has been widely quoted and relied on, even though it seems the statement itself was dictum. See Young…

Spruill v. Downing

They have cited many cases in which there was a lack of evidence as to when, how, or why the victim…