From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magula v. Infante

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 17, 1993
616 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-1472.

April 21, 1993. Rehearing Denied May 17, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Paul Marko, J.

Steve Magula, pro se.

Linda R. Spaulding of Conrad, Scherer, James Jenne, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee — North Broward Hosp. Dist., d/b/a Broward General Medical Center.

Shelley H. Leinicke of Wicker, Smith, Tutan, O'Hara, McCoy, Graham Lane, P.A., for appellee — Dr. Charles M. Infante, D.D.S.


Appellants appeal the dismissal of their complaint which attempts to reopen a medical malpractice action against appellees. That action was terminated favorably to appellees several years ago. Appellants claim extrinsic fraud because of the legal malpractice of appellants' attorney in the prior case. Appellant conceded at oral argument that he did not claim that there was any fraud committed by appellees or any collusion between appellees and appellants' former attorney. There is a pending malpractice claim against the former attorney.

We affirm, as allegations of legal malpractice against the attorney do not constitute extrinsic fraud so as to set aside the judgment. Parker v. Parker, 585 So.2d 328 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Calehuff v. Calehuff, 433 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Magula v. Infante

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 17, 1993
616 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Magula v. Infante

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MAGULA, A MINOR, STEVE MAGULA AS NEXT BEST FRIEND, AND STEVE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 17, 1993

Citations

616 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Gordon v. Gordon

Such a lengthy delay may always be defended on the basis of laches, but this usually involves an evidentiary…