From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magdaleno v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Spartanburg Division
Nov 25, 2009
C/A No.: 7:06-cr-00703-GRA-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 25, 2009)

Opinion

C/A No.: 7:06-cr-00703-GRA-2.

November 25, 2009


ORDER (Written Opinion)


This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration of this Court's Order filed November 9, 2009, which denied Petitioner's Motion, filed October 19, 2009, titled "Request for Specific Performance of the Plea Agreement Pursuant to F.R.Cr.P. Rule 35(b)."

Petitioner brings this claim pro se. This Court is required to construe pro se pleadings liberally. Such pleadings are held to a less stringent standard than those drafted by attorneys. See Gordon v. Leeke, 574 F.2d 1147, 1151 (4th Cir. 1978). This Court is charged with liberally construing a pleading filed by a pro se litigant to allow for the development of a potentially meritorious claim. See Boag v. MacDougall, 454 U.S. 364, 365 (1982).

Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration asks the Court to revisit its analysis of Petitioner's claims. After a review of the record, this Court finds that its prior decision was and is correct as a matter of law. Consequently, this Court must deny Plaintiff's motion.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

Pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has the right to appeal this Order within sixty (60) days from the date of its entry. Failure to meet this deadline, as modified by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, will waive the right to appeal.


Summaries of

Magdaleno v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Spartanburg Division
Nov 25, 2009
C/A No.: 7:06-cr-00703-GRA-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 25, 2009)
Case details for

Magdaleno v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Ivan Magdaleno, Petitioner, v. United States of America, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Spartanburg Division

Date published: Nov 25, 2009

Citations

C/A No.: 7:06-cr-00703-GRA-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 25, 2009)

Citing Cases

Cole v. United States

Accordingly, even under a liberal construction, the Motion for Transcripts is not a § 2255 petition. See…