Opinion
C/A No.: 7:06-cr-00703-GRA-2.
November 25, 2009
ORDER (Written Opinion)
This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration of this Court's Order filed November 9, 2009, which denied Petitioner's Motion, filed October 19, 2009, titled "Request for Specific Performance of the Plea Agreement Pursuant to F.R.Cr.P. Rule 35(b)."
Petitioner brings this claim pro se. This Court is required to construe pro se pleadings liberally. Such pleadings are held to a less stringent standard than those drafted by attorneys. See Gordon v. Leeke, 574 F.2d 1147, 1151 (4th Cir. 1978). This Court is charged with liberally construing a pleading filed by a pro se litigant to allow for the development of a potentially meritorious claim. See Boag v. MacDougall, 454 U.S. 364, 365 (1982).
Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration asks the Court to revisit its analysis of Petitioner's claims. After a review of the record, this Court finds that its prior decision was and is correct as a matter of law. Consequently, this Court must deny Plaintiff's motion.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.