From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madinya v. Consol. Edison Co. of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 29, 1994
202 A.D.2d 356 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 29, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.).


Plaintiff's initial statement that he fell climbing the scaffold conflicts with the statement in his affidavit in support of the motion that he was standing on a scaffold when one of the planks came loose. Since plaintiff's version of the accident is inconsistent with other versions in the record, as to a material issue, a triable question of fact has been presented (see, Carlos v. Rochester Gen. Hosp., 163 A.D.2d 894).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Rubin and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Madinya v. Consol. Edison Co. of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 29, 1994
202 A.D.2d 356 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Madinya v. Consol. Edison Co. of New York

Case Details

Full title:EDWARDO MADINYA, Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 29, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 356 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
609 N.Y.S.2d 17

Citing Cases

Manning v. Johnson Building Company, Inc.

According to the deposition testimony of plaintiff's foreman, plaintiff told him that he had "walked off the…

Laisney v. Zeller

Plaintiffs failed to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law because they failed to…