From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madaio v. Roden

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Apr 20, 2010
375 F. App'x 921 (11th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 08-14570.

April 20, 2010.

Andrew Lynn Brasher, Bradley Arant Rose White LLP, Birmingham, AL, Scott Burnett Smith, Bradley Arant Rose White LLP, Huntsville, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Steven I. Frank, Washington, DC, Ramona C. Albin, U.S. Attorney's Office ND/ AL, Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. D.C. Docket No. 06-00904-CV-BE-S.

Before HULL, WILSON and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Honorable Jerome Farris, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.


Appellant Christopher Madaio appeals the district court's order, dated March 31, 2008(1) granting summary judgment to the appellee FBI on Madaio's claims for money damages for violations of the Privacy Protection Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000aa et seq.; (2) denying Madaio's motion in limine and motion for more discovery; and (3) striking certain affidavits. Appellant Madaio also appeals the district court's order, dated July 7, 2008, denying Madaio's motion to alter or amend the judgment. After oral argument and review, this Court affirms finding no reversible error.

Nothing herein shall affect Madaio's rights to seek return of any legal property from the FBI under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure or as otherwise permitted under law.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Madaio v. Roden

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Apr 20, 2010
375 F. App'x 921 (11th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Madaio v. Roden

Case Details

Full title:Christopher MADAIO, an individual and private citizen residing in the City…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Apr 20, 2010

Citations

375 F. App'x 921 (11th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Gorence & Oliveros, P.C. v. Chavez (In re Chavez)

That assumption is mistaken and this court will not countenance the filing of a sham affidavit." The court…