From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maclin v. Montgomery & Sons Constr., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 19, 2012
No. 4:12-cv-5-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 19, 2012)

Opinion

No. 4:12-cv-5-DPM

12-19-2012

STEPHEN MACLIN; RUBEN TOBIN; DUSTIN ROBINSON; and GERARD JOHNSON, all individually and on behalf of others similarly situated PLAINTIFFS v. MONTGOMERY AND SONS CONSTRUCTION, INC and JOHN MONTGOMERY, individually and as owner/manager of Montgomery and Sons Construction, Inc. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

Discovery problems are stalling this case. In light of Montgomery's recent change of counsel, the Court requests a joint five-page report on the discovery issues, as instructed in the Final Scheduling Order. Document No. 25, at 3. Report due by 10 January 2013. Motion to compel and for sanctions, Document No. 55, denied without prejudice. The Court approves the notice and consent form. Document No. 51-1.

So Ordered.

____________________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Maclin v. Montgomery & Sons Constr., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 19, 2012
No. 4:12-cv-5-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Maclin v. Montgomery & Sons Constr., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN MACLIN; RUBEN TOBIN; DUSTIN ROBINSON; and GERARD JOHNSON, all…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 19, 2012

Citations

No. 4:12-cv-5-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 19, 2012)