From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mackey v. Home Depot USA, Inc.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Aug 5, 2020
195 Wash. 2d 1031 (Wash. 2020)

Summary

recognizing that WLAD provides a clear mandate of public policy

Summary of this case from Suarez v. State

Opinion

No. 98362-3

08-05-2020

Lori MACKEY, Petitioner, v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC., et al., Respondents.


ORDER

¶ 1 A Special Department of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Stephens and Justices Madsen, González, Gordon McCloud, and Yu considered at its August 4, 2020, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied.

For the Court

/s/ Stephens, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Mackey v. Home Depot USA, Inc.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Aug 5, 2020
195 Wash. 2d 1031 (Wash. 2020)

recognizing that WLAD provides a clear mandate of public policy

Summary of this case from Suarez v. State
Case details for

Mackey v. Home Depot USA, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Lori MACKEY, Petitioner, v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC., et al., Respondents.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Aug 5, 2020

Citations

195 Wash. 2d 1031 (Wash. 2020)
468 P.3d 616

Citing Cases

U.S. Bank v. Roosild

In reviewing a summary judgment decision, we apply the same standard as the trial court. Mackey v. Home Depot…

Suarez v. State

¶57 The public policy against discrimination as set forth in the WLAD can form the basis for a tort claim…