From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MacKenzie v. Union Railway Company of New York City

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 3, 1904
178 N.Y. 638 (N.Y. 1904)

Opinion

Argued May 20, 1904

Decided June 3, 1904

Franklin Pierce and I. Newton Williams for appellant.

Charles F. Brown, Bayard H. Ames and Henry A. Robinson for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, MARTIN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ. Absent: HAIGHT, J.


Summaries of

MacKenzie v. Union Railway Company of New York City

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 3, 1904
178 N.Y. 638 (N.Y. 1904)
Case details for

MacKenzie v. Union Railway Company of New York City

Case Details

Full title:STEWART W. MacKENZIE, Appellant, v . UNION RAILWAY COMPANY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 3, 1904

Citations

178 N.Y. 638 (N.Y. 1904)
71 N.E. 1134

Citing Cases

Sheridan v. City of New York

Furthermore, it can no longer be doubted that transportation companies operating these vehicles owe a duty to…

Schwartz v. Brooklyn and Queens Transit Corp.

( Keener v. Tilton, 283 N.Y. 454; Young v. Jamaica Buses, Inc., 262 App. Div. 860; Lewis v. Brooklyn Bus…