From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Macedonio v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 15, 2016
145 A.D.3d 1311 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

12-15-2016

In the Matter of Carl MACEDONIO, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.

Carl Macedonio, Ossining, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.


Carl Macedonio, Ossining, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Ballard v. Racette, 140 A.D.3d 1428, 1428, 34 N.Y.S.3d 667 [2016] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

McCARTHY, J.P., LYNCH, ROSE, MULVEY and AARONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Macedonio v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 15, 2016
145 A.D.3d 1311 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Macedonio v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Carl MACEDONIO, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 15, 2016

Citations

145 A.D.3d 1311 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
145 A.D.3d 1311
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 8429

Citing Cases

Palczewski v. Annucci

As the letter does not indicate that petitioner has been refunded the mandatory $5 surcharge (see 7 NYCRR…