From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MacCrone v. Edwards Center, Inc.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 29, 2001
31 P.3d 513 (Or. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

9509-06509; A95658

Submitted on remand June 21, 2001.

Filed: August 29, 2001

On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, MacCrone v. Edwards Center, Inc., 332 Or. 41, 22 P.3d 758 (2001).

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Judge.

Gregory Kafoury and Mark McDougal for appellant-cross-respondent.

I. Franklin Hunsaker for respondent-cross-appellant.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and WARREN, Senior Judge.


PER CURIAM

On appeal, reversed and remanded with instructions to reinstate jury's verdict; on cross-appeal, affirmed.


The Supreme Court remands this case to us for reconsideration in light of its decision in Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, 331 Or. 537, 17 P.3d 473 (2001). Parrott involves the standard for reviewing an award of punitive damages. We reinstated the jury's verdict for punitive damages after the trial court had granted a remittitur. After considering Parrott, we adhere to our previous decision.

On appeal, reversed and remanded with instructions to reinstate jury's verdict; on cross-appeal, affirmed.


Summaries of

MacCrone v. Edwards Center, Inc.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 29, 2001
31 P.3d 513 (Or. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

MacCrone v. Edwards Center, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER MacCRONE, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. EDWARDS CENTER, INC., an…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 29, 2001

Citations

31 P.3d 513 (Or. Ct. App. 2001)
31 P.3d 513

Citing Cases

Williams v. Morris Inc.

That is consistent with the way that we have always reviewed trial court decisions regarding punitive…

Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Oregon appellate courts have never applied a deferential "abuse of discretion" standard of review to trial…