From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Macarthur v. Curtin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 31, 2014
No. 13-CV-11307 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 31, 2014)

Summary

adopting magistrate judge's report and citing cases

Summary of this case from Howell v. Christiansen

Opinion

No. 13-CV-11307

07-31-2014

DOUGLAS MacARTHUR, Petitioner, v. CINDI CURTIN, Respondent.


Hon. Gerald E. Rosen

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S HABEAS CORPUS ACTION

At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on July 31, 2014. PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

Chief Judge, United States District Court

This matter having come before the Court on the March 27, 2014 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff's petition for a writ of habeas corpus and that this case, accordingly, be dismissed; and no timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation having been filed; and the Court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Court's file of this action and having concluded that, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's petition for habeas corpus relief should be denied; and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation of March 27, 2014 [Dkt. # 16] be, and hereby is, adopted by this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's petition for habeas corpus relief Dkt. # 1] be, and hereby is DENIED and the above-captioned case, therefore, is DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that leave to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED.

s/ Gerald E. Rosen

Chief Judge, United States District Court
Dated: July 31, 2014 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on July 31, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Julie Owens

Case Manager, (313) 234-5135


Summaries of

Macarthur v. Curtin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 31, 2014
No. 13-CV-11307 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 31, 2014)

adopting magistrate judge's report and citing cases

Summary of this case from Howell v. Christiansen

adopting magistrate judge's report and citing cases

Summary of this case from Shelton v. Horton
Case details for

Macarthur v. Curtin

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS MacARTHUR, Petitioner, v. CINDI CURTIN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 31, 2014

Citations

No. 13-CV-11307 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 31, 2014)

Citing Cases

Shelton v. Horton

First, Petitioner's claim that he received inadequate notice of the habitual offender enhancement under…

Morrison v. Warden, Noble Corr. Inst.

Such language can "equally be read as indicating that the parties had not agreed jointly on a particular…