Opinion
October 4, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in refusing to sign the proposed judgment submitted by the plaintiff and dismissing the complaint pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.48 as the plaintiff did not demonstrate "good cause" for its delay (see, York v. General Elec. Co., 170 A.D.2d 322; Tuller v. Tuller, 162 A.D.2d 801). Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.