From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lyden Nursing Home v. DeBuono

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 2001
287 A.D.2d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted September 20, 2001.

October 9, 2001.

In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is entitled to a recalculation of its Medicaid reimbursement rates for the years 1993 through 1996, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), dated June 6, 2000, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Skolnick, Hochberg Bernfeld, P.C., New York, N.Y. (David B. Bernfeld and Mark W. Geisler of counsel), for appellant.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Marion R. Buchbinder and Mary Fisher Bernet of counsel), for respondents.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, NANCY E. SMITH and BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not entitled to a recalculation of its Medicaid reimbursement rates for the years 1993 through 1996.

The plaintiff, a nursing home receiving Medicaid reimbursement, brought this action for a judgment declaring that it is entitled to a recalculation of its Medicaid reimbursement rates for the years 1993 through 1996. The plaintiff challenged the defendants' rejection of several issues raised on an administrative appeal following an audit (see, 10 NYCRR 86-2.13). In granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment, the Supreme Court correctly found that the plaintiff raised noncomputational challenges to the agency methodology in determining rates (see, Matter of Evergreen Val. Nursing Home v. DeBuono, 277 A.D.2d 569, 570; Matter of Sylcox v. Chassin, 227 A.D.2d 834, 836), which had to have been raised within four months of initial receipt of the rates (see, CPLR 217; Sitrin Nursing Home Co. v. McBarnette, 198 A.D.2d 579; Matter of Sylcox Nursing Home Health Related Facility v. Axelrod, 184 A.D.2d 986).

We note that since this is a declaratory judgment action, the Supreme Court should have directed the entry of a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not entitled to a recalculation of its Medicaid reimbursement rates for the years 1993 through 1996, rather than dismiss the complaint (see, Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, 334, appeal dismissed 371 U.S. 74, cert denied 371 U.S. 901).


Summaries of

Lyden Nursing Home v. DeBuono

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 2001
287 A.D.2d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Lyden Nursing Home v. DeBuono

Case Details

Full title:LYDEN NURSING HOME, APPELLANT, v. BARBARA A. DeBUONO, ETC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 9, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 389

Citing Cases

In re of Field Home-Holy Comforter v. Novello

Our determination reflects that agreement to recalculate, and the DOH's calculations were otherwise rational…

Beth Israel Med. Ctr. v. D.O.H. of State of N.Y.

It has been repeatedly held that where a petition "does not allege a computational error but, rather,…