From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lutz v. Valeska

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 5, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10cv950-TMH (WO) (M.D. Ala. Mar. 5, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10cv950-TMH (WO)

03-05-2014

PHILLIP M. LUTZ, Petitioner, v. DOUGLAS VALESKA, et al., Respondents.


OPINION and ORDER

On January 31, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case recommending that the petition of habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. # 20). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, that the petition for habeas corpus relief be and is hereby DENIED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

Mark E. Fuller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lutz v. Valeska

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 5, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10cv950-TMH (WO) (M.D. Ala. Mar. 5, 2014)
Case details for

Lutz v. Valeska

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP M. LUTZ, Petitioner, v. DOUGLAS VALESKA, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 5, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10cv950-TMH (WO) (M.D. Ala. Mar. 5, 2014)

Citing Cases

Crowell v. Kelley

9 (E.D. Mo. Sept. 28, 2012); Anderson v. Koster, No. 11-1227-CV-W-GAF-P, 2012 WL 1898781, at *9 (W.D. Mo. May…

Willis v. Kelley

(E.D. Mo. Sept. 28, 2012); Anderson v. Koster, No. 11-1227-CV-W-GAF-P, 2012 WL 1898781, at *9 (W.D. Mo. May…