From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lupton Manufacturing Co. v. United States

U.S.
Jun 12, 1967
388 U.S. 457 (1967)

Summary

In Lupton the Court dismissed per curiam an appeal from a denial of intervention in a case involving an antitrust consent decree.

Summary of this case from Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI.

No. 1296.

Decided June 12, 1967.

Appeal dismissed.

Leonard J. Emmerglick for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Howard E. Shapiro for the United States, and Herbert A. Bergson, Daniel H. Margolis, Donald L. Hardison and William K. Unverzagt for Aluminum Co. of America et al., appellees.


The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Lupton Manufacturing Co. v. United States

U.S.
Jun 12, 1967
388 U.S. 457 (1967)

In Lupton the Court dismissed per curiam an appeal from a denial of intervention in a case involving an antitrust consent decree.

Summary of this case from Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education
Case details for

Lupton Manufacturing Co. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:LUPTON MANUFACTURING CO. v . UNITED STATES ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 12, 1967

Citations

388 U.S. 457 (1967)

Citing Cases

United States v. Ciba Corp.

A string of later decisions, sustained by the Supreme Court, have made this reasonably clear. United States…

United States v. Hooker Chemicals Plastics

The Court's per curiam dismissal a few months later on an appeal from a denial of intervention in a case…