From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lupoli v. Lupoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 13, 1994
205 A.D.2d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

June 13, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the respondent Matthew M. Lupoli, Jr.

The Supreme Court did not err in denying the plaintiff's motion to remove the Surrogate's Court proceeding to Supreme Court and consolidate it with the instant action as the Surrogate's Court proceeding raised several issues which were not raised in this action, and there were no special circumstances which warranted transferring the Surrogate's Court proceeding to the Supreme Court (see, Matter of Moody, 6 A.D.2d 861). In addition, the Supreme Court did not err in staying this action, pending resolution of the Surrogate's Court proceeding, as the determination of the Surrogate's Court proceeding may dispose of the issues in the instant action (see, Hill v. Hill, 72 N.Y.S.2d 720).

We have examined the plaintiff's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. We decline the invitation to award sanctions in connection with this appeal. Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lupoli v. Lupoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 13, 1994
205 A.D.2d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Lupoli v. Lupoli

Case Details

Full title:PETER LUPOLI, Appellant, v. MATTHEW LUPOLI et al., Respondents. (Matter…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 13, 1994

Citations

205 A.D.2d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
613 N.Y.S.2d 423

Citing Cases

Trahan v. Galea

Here, and despite the presence of certain common issues ( Glussi v. Fortune Brands, Inc., 276 AD2d 586), the…

Srybnik v. Srybnik

Even though there was not a complete identity of the parties, there were overlapping issues and common…