From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lundgren v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Mar 3, 2011
No. 02-11-00023-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 3, 2011)

Opinion

No. 02-11-00023-CR

Delivered: March 3, 2011. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Appealed from the County Court at Law of Wise County.

PANEL: WALKER, McCOY, and MEIER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Pursuant to a plea bargain, Appellant Jerry Paul Lundgren pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated second. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.09(a) (Vernon Supp. 2010). The trial court sentenced Appellant on January 7, 2011, to 365 days' confinement, suspended the sentence of confinement, and placed him on community supervision for eighteen months. The trial court's certification of Appellant's right of appeal states that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." Appellant filed a notice of appeal on January 19, 2011. Concerned that we did not have jurisdiction over this appeal, we sent a letter to Appellant's retained counsel requesting a response by January 31, 2011, showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received a response. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 43.2(f).

We did receive a copy of a motion for new trial that was filed in the trial court on January 28, 2011. This does not, however, address the issue of the trial court's certification. See Estrada v. State, 149 S.W.3d 280, 282 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd) (op. on reh'g and for en banc reconsideration) (stating that there is no exception for the trial court's refusal to grant permission to appeal).


Summaries of

Lundgren v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Mar 3, 2011
No. 02-11-00023-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Lundgren v. State

Case Details

Full title:JERRY PAUL LUNDGREN, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Mar 3, 2011

Citations

No. 02-11-00023-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 3, 2011)

Citing Cases

Regan v. State

Thus, even if Regan's arguments regarding Rule 25.2 in the deferred-adjudication context are correct, Rule…

Lundgren v. State

The court of appeals asked Appellant to show grounds that his appeal conferred jurisdiction on the court of…