From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lundahl v. Eli Lilly & Co.

U.S.
Apr 25, 2005
544 U.S. 997 (2005)

Opinion

No. 04-8838.

April 25, 2005.


Certiorari Dismissed.

C.A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein. JUSTICE O'CONNOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.


Summaries of

Lundahl v. Eli Lilly & Co.

U.S.
Apr 25, 2005
544 U.S. 997 (2005)
Case details for

Lundahl v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Case Details

Full title:LUNDAHL v. ELI LILLY Co. ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 25, 2005

Citations

544 U.S. 997 (2005)
125 S. Ct. 1940

Citing Cases

Lundahl v. Hawkins

Civil Action 08-036-BLG-RFC, Order Dismissing Pl.'s Complaint (D. Mont. May 9, 2008), p. 5. See also Lundahl…

Nelson v. Mountain W. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co.

3. The United States Supreme Court; Lundahl v. Eli Lilly & Co., 544 U.S. 997, 125 S.Ct. 1940, 161 L.Ed.2d 771…