From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lumentum Operations LLC v. nLight, Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 22, 2024
3:22-CV-05186-BHS (W.D. Wash. Jul. 22, 2024)

Opinion

3:22-CV-05186-BHS

07-22-2024

LUMENTUM OPERATIONS LLC, Plaintiff, v. NLIGHT, INC.; DAHV KLINER; and ROGER L. FARROW, Defendants.

BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP, Tyler L. Farmer, Elisabeth Read, WILEY REIN LLP, Scott A. Felder (Pro Hac Vice), Wesley E. Weeks (Pro Hac Vice), Lisa M. Rechden (Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Defendants nLIGHT, Inc., Dahv Kliner and Roger L. Farrow FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP, David J.F. Gross, Braden M. Katterheinrich, Johnathon E. Webb, Doowon R. Chung, Joel D. Sayres, Shelby Pickar-Dennis, Zachary D. Wawrzyniakowski, CORR|DOWNS PLLC, Joseph P. Corr, Attorneys for Plaintiff Lumentum Operations LLC


BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP, Tyler L. Farmer, Elisabeth Read, WILEY REIN LLP, Scott A. Felder (Pro Hac Vice), Wesley E. Weeks (Pro Hac Vice), Lisa M. Rechden (Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Defendants nLIGHT, Inc., Dahv Kliner and Roger L. Farrow

FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP, David J.F. Gross, Braden M. Katterheinrich, Johnathon E. Webb, Doowon R. Chung, Joel D. Sayres, Shelby Pickar-Dennis, Zachary D. Wawrzyniakowski, CORR|DOWNS PLLC, Joseph P. Corr, Attorneys for Plaintiff Lumentum Operations LLC

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES RELATED TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND RENOTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE, United States District Judge

STIPULATED MOTION

Plaintiff Lumentum Operations LLC (“Lumentum”) and Defendants nLIGHT, Inc. (“nLIGHT”), Dahv Kliner (“Kliner”), and Roger L. Farrow (“Farrow”) (collectively, the “Parties”), hereby respectfully submit this Stipulated Motion to Extend the Time for Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Dkt. 90).

The Parties have agreed to continue the meet and confer process. As a result, and pursuant to LCR 7(j), the Parties agreed to defer Defendants' Response to the pending Motion to allow time to complete that process. Accordingly, the Parties respectfully request that:

1. The Court extend Defendants' Response deadline to July 30, 2024-giving 1 additional week for the Parties to confer;
2. The Court extend Lumentum's Reply deadline to August 5, 2024; and
3. Lumentum's Motion to Compel (Dkt. 90) be renoted for August 5, 2024.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

ORDER

This matter, having come before the Court on the above stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED THAT:

Relief is granted to extend Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Defendants shall file their Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel no later than July 30, 2024.

Relief is granted to extend Plaintiff's Reply in support of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Plaintiff shall file its Reply in support of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel no later than August 5, 2024.

Relief is granted to renote Plaintiff's Motion to Compel for August 5, 2024.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lumentum Operations LLC v. nLight, Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 22, 2024
3:22-CV-05186-BHS (W.D. Wash. Jul. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Lumentum Operations LLC v. nLight, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LUMENTUM OPERATIONS LLC, Plaintiff, v. NLIGHT, INC.; DAHV KLINER; and…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jul 22, 2024

Citations

3:22-CV-05186-BHS (W.D. Wash. Jul. 22, 2024)