From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luma v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 8, 2005
903 So. 2d 302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 3D05-450.

June 8, 2005.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jacqueline Hogan Scola, Judge.

Herby Luma, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Ishir Mehta, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, FLETCHER and RAMIREZ, JJ.


Affirmed. See Forcelledo v. State, 898 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ("The State is allowed to give notice under as many classifications as it chooses, where the State is prepared to show the defendant meets the statutory criteria."); Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (notice deficiency does not render a sentence "illegal" for the purposes of a rule 3.800 petition; claim should have been raised via 3.850 and is now time barred).


Summaries of

Luma v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 8, 2005
903 So. 2d 302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Luma v. State

Case Details

Full title:Herby LUMA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 8, 2005

Citations

903 So. 2d 302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Luma v. State

Affirmed; order to show cause issued.Luma v. State, 225 So. 3d 821 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (table); Luma v. State,…