From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luksic v. Killmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1986
121 A.D.2d 607 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

June 23, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Rubenfeld, J.).


Order affirmed, with costs.

This action, commenced more than three years after the cause of action accrued, was properly dismissed as time barred. Because statutory authorization existed for obtaining jurisdiction over the person of the defendant by means other than personal delivery of the summons within this State, the tolling provision of CPLR 207 was unavailable to salvage the plaintiff's action (see, Yarusso v. Arbotowicz, 41 N.Y.2d 516). Accordingly, the order of Special Term is affirmed. Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Luksic v. Killmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1986
121 A.D.2d 607 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Luksic v. Killmer

Case Details

Full title:STEFAN LUKSIC, Appellant, v. JOHN S. KILLMER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 23, 1986

Citations

121 A.D.2d 607 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Salamon v. Friedman

Contrary to the petitioners' contention, the limitations period was not tolled due to the appellant's absence…