From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luedeke v. Coursen

City Court of New York — General Term
May 1, 1893
3 Misc. 559 (N.Y. City Ct. 1893)

Opinion

May, 1893.

Hayman Rosenthal, for defendant (appellant).

Robert Godson, for plaintiff (respondent).


Where no actual loss or injury is produced by the disobedience to an order in supplementary proceedings, the fine imposed cannot exceed $250 and costs. Code, § 2284. If actual loss or injury is produced, the amount thereof must be based upon legal proof of the damage actually sustained. Moffat v. Herman, 116 N.Y. 135; Sudlow v. Knox, 7 Abb. (N.S.) 411; De Jonge v. Brenneman, 23 Hun, 332; Clark v. Bininger, 75 N.Y. 344; King v. Flynn, 37 Hun, 329; Gallagher v. O'Neil, 21 N.Y.S.t. Repr. 163. No such assessment of damages appears by the appeal book, and the order appealed from must, therefore, be modified by reducing the fine to the statutory limit, $250 and $30 costs, and, as modified, the order appealed from will be affirmed, without costs. See De Jonge v. Brenneman, 23 Hun, 332; Erie R.R. Co. v. Ramsey, 45 N.Y. 637.

NEWBURGER, J., concurs.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Luedeke v. Coursen

City Court of New York — General Term
May 1, 1893
3 Misc. 559 (N.Y. City Ct. 1893)
Case details for

Luedeke v. Coursen

Case Details

Full title:LUEDEKE et al. v . COURSEN

Court:City Court of New York — General Term

Date published: May 1, 1893

Citations

3 Misc. 559 (N.Y. City Ct. 1893)
23 N.Y.S. 314

Citing Cases

Taber v. Manhattan R. Co.

Where actual loss or injury is claimed the proof thereof must be according to the rules of law applicable to…

ROSS v. LA CAGNINA

The maximum fine which could be imposed upon him as a punishment for such contempt, where no actual loss or…