From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucia v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 21, 2011
Case No. 3:10-CV-04749 (JSW) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2011)

Summary

finding borrowers, who were neither parties to nor intended third party beneficiaries of Servicer Participation Agreement between Wells Fargo and Fannie Mae, lack standing to assert a breach of contract claim.

Summary of this case from Ganesan v. GMAC Mortg., LLC

Opinion

Case No. 3:10-CV-04749 (JSW).

March 21, 2011

Matthew G. Ball (SBN: 208881), K L GATES LLP, San Francisco, CA, Irene C. Freidel ( pro hac vice), David D. Christensen ( pro hac vice), K L GATES LLP, Boston, MA, Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE


Pursuant to Local Rules 6-3 and 7-11, and good cause so appearing, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Administrative Motion to Continue Case Management Conference is hereby GRANTED. The case management conference currently scheduled for April 8, 2011 at 1:30 p.m., is hereby vacated and shall be rescheduled, if necessary, by separate order. The parties shall file a joint case management statement no later than five (5) court days prior to the conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lucia v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 21, 2011
Case No. 3:10-CV-04749 (JSW) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2011)

finding borrowers, who were neither parties to nor intended third party beneficiaries of Servicer Participation Agreement between Wells Fargo and Fannie Mae, lack standing to assert a breach of contract claim.

Summary of this case from Ganesan v. GMAC Mortg., LLC

finding borrowers, who were neither parties to nor intended third party beneficiaries of Servicer Participation Agreement between Wells Fargo and Fannie Mae, lack standing to assert a breach of contract claim.

Summary of this case from Hale v. World Sav. Bank

finding borrowers, who were neither parties to nor intended third party beneficiaries of Servicer Participation Agreement between Wells Fargo and Fannie Mae, lack standing to assert a breach of contract claim.

Summary of this case from Sami v. Wells Fargo Bank

dismissing breach of contract claim under Rule 12(b) on the basis that TPP did not give rise to enforceable contract because the plaintiffs had not alleged that they had received a modification agreement, as required under Section 2 of the TPP

Summary of this case from Laughlin v. Bank of Am., N.A.

explaining that HAMP "provide relief to borrowers who have defaulted on their mortgage payments or who are likely to default by reducing mortgage payments to sustainable reduced levels, without discharging any of the underlying debt"

Summary of this case from Villarino v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
Case details for

Lucia v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:KAREN LUCIA and JEFFREY LUCIA, on behalf of themselves and others…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Mar 21, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:10-CV-04749 (JSW) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2011)

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Williford

Pl.'s Resp. Ex. A, Step One of Two-Step Documentation Process, ¶ 2.G. See Lucia v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,…

Casault v. Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass'n

In Lucia v. Wells Fargo Bank, the court found Plaintiffs' allegations that “the communications from Wells…