From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucas v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 1, 2014
No. ED CV 13-00310-VBF (VBK) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2014)

Opinion

No. ED CV 13-00310-VBF (VBK)

07-01-2014

STEPHEN S. LUCAS, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE et al., Respondents.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Overruling Petitioner's Objections and Denying a

Certificate of Appealability

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition"), the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"). Further, the Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected (see Document 105).

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Court overrules petitioner's objections; (2) the Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, and (3) the Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability ("COA").

Under 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2), a COA may issue "only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." The Supreme Court has held that, to obtain a Certificate of Appealability under §2253(c), a habeas petitioner must show that "reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were 'adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further'." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84, 120 S.Ct. 1595 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029 (2003).
"The Court is mindful that it 'must resolve doubts about the propriety of a COA in the petitioner's favor', Jennings v. Woodford, 290 F.3d 1006, 1010 (9th Cir. 2012) (citing Lambright v. Stewart, 220 F.3d 1022, 1025 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc)), but no such doubt exists here." Cornish v. Brazleton, 2014 WL 1457768, *2 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2014) (Fairbank, J.). After review of Petitioner's contentions herein, this Court concludes that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, as is required to support the issuance of a COA.

__________

VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lucas v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 1, 2014
No. ED CV 13-00310-VBF (VBK) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2014)
Case details for

Lucas v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN S. LUCAS, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 1, 2014

Citations

No. ED CV 13-00310-VBF (VBK) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2014)