From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucas v. Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1934
174 S.E. 301 (N.C. 1934)

Opinion

(Filed 2 May, 1934.)

Pleadings D b —

Demurrer for misjoinder of parties and causes of action held properly sustained, the several causes of action alleged not affecting all the parties to the action. C.S., 507.

APPEAL by plaintiff from Frizzelle, J., at Chambers in Snow Hill, 15 December, 1933. From CRAVEN.

L. I. Moore, V. B. Derrickson, E. M. Green and R. E. Whitehurst for plaintiff.

Kenneth C. Royall and Brooks, Parker Holderness for defendants.


Civil action to recover for (1) alleged contract breaches and (2) torts committed on the part of the corporate defendant, and (3) alleged neglect of official duties and (4) torts committed by the Commissioner of Banks, Gurney P. Hood.

Demurrer was interposed on the ground of misjoinder of parties and causes of action.

From a judgment sustaining the demurrer, the plaintiff appeals.


The demurrer was properly sustained on the ground of a misjoinder of both parties and causes of action. Williams v. Gooch, ante, 330; Carswell v. Whisenant, 203 N.C. 674, 166 S.E. 793; Grady v. Warren, 201 N.C. 693, 161 S.E. 319; Sasser v. Bullard, 199 N.C. 562, 155 S.E. 248. The several causes of action, united in the same complaint, do not "affect all the parties to the action," as required by C.S., 507.

Where this dual misjoinder occurs, and a demurrer is accordingly interposed, the decisions are to the effect that the action should be dismissed. Shuford v. Yarbrough, 198 N.C. 5, 150 S.E. 618; Roberts v. Mfg. Co., 181 N.C. 204, 106 S.E. 664.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Lucas v. Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1934
174 S.E. 301 (N.C. 1934)
Case details for

Lucas v. Bank

Case Details

Full title:LUCAS AND LEWIS ET AL. v. NORTH CAROLINA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 1934

Citations

174 S.E. 301 (N.C. 1934)
174 S.E. 301

Citing Cases

Nye v. Pure Oil Co.

With this command in mind, we have examined the complaint to ascertain the facts alleged warranting a…

Moore County v. Burns

There can be no division of the action under G.S., 1-132. The whole must fall. Beam v. Wright, 222 N.C. 174,…