From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lubin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 24, 2000
758 So. 2d 747 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 3D99-49.

Opinion filed May 24, 2000.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Roberto Pineiro, Judge, L.T. No. 96-37108.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Jill K. Traina, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, GREEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.


Defendant appeals from judgments of conviction and sentences for attempted second degree murder of a law enforcement officer, grand theft auto, aggravated battery of a person over sixty-five years of age, and attempted robbery. We affirm.

Although the State confessed error on the sentencing issue, its confession was incorrect. "Although the sentences imposed on the defendant in the present case exceeded the statutory maximum, they were not illegal because they fell within the recommended sentencing guidelines." Escutary v. State, 753 So.2d 650 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). See also, Mays v. State, 717 So.2d 515 (Fla. 1998).

We note that this is not the first time the State has incorrectly confessed error on this point; we trust it will be the last.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Lubin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 24, 2000
758 So. 2d 747 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Lubin v. State

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS LUBIN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 24, 2000

Citations

758 So. 2d 747 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Padilla v. State

In denying the defendant's motion on the grounds raised, the trial court, however, erred in reducing the…