From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lovvorn v. City of Chattanooga

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Aug 3, 1988
861 F.2d 1388 (6th Cir. 1988)

Opinion

No. 86-6281.

August 3, 1988.

Before ENGEL, Chief Judge, LIVELY, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.


Summaries of

Lovvorn v. City of Chattanooga

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Aug 3, 1988
861 F.2d 1388 (6th Cir. 1988)
Case details for

Lovvorn v. City of Chattanooga

Case Details

Full title:ROLAND M. LOVVORN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. THE CITY OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Aug 3, 1988

Citations

861 F.2d 1388 (6th Cir. 1988)

Citing Cases

National Air Traffic Controllers Ass'n v. Burnley

53 Fed.Reg. 11970 (April 11, 1988). Not only do these guidelines require an initial immunoassay test which…

Holliday v. City of Modesto

" None of the cases cited by the lower court, however, have anything to do with the bargaining requirements…