From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lovett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 1, 1997
700 So. 2d 91 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-01691.

Opinion filed October 1, 1997.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Robert J. Simms, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John S. Lynch, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael J. Scionti, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Anthony Lovett appeals the revocation of his probation. Because the evidence supports the trial court's findings as to the violation of condition C, we affirm the revocation. The finding in the written order that Lovett violated condition 3 must be stricken, as the State concedes, because the trial court's oral findings did not include a violation of that condition.

The order of revocation is affirmed, but the finding that Lovett violated condition 3 is stricken.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and FULMER and QUINCE, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Lovett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 1, 1997
700 So. 2d 91 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Lovett v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY LOVETT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 1, 1997

Citations

700 So. 2d 91 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

Thus, the written finding that appellant failed to pay costs is erroneous. See Lovett v. State, 700 So.2d 91…