granting disqualification motion, stating that “as there is no basis for concluding that the holdings of well-established case law ha[ve] been eviscerated by the adoption of the New Rules [of Professional Conduct], resort to such case law may be made by the Court”
Summary of this case from Anderson & Anderson LLP v. N. Am. Foreign Trading Corp.No. 018057/08.
July 30, 2009.
Attorney and Client — Disqualification — Advocate-Witness Disqualification.
granting disqualification motion, stating that “as there is no basis for concluding that the holdings of well-established case law ha[ve] been eviscerated by the adoption of the New Rules [of Professional Conduct], resort to such case law may be made by the Court”
Summary of this case from Anderson & Anderson LLP v. N. Am. Foreign Trading Corp.Full title:Losquadro v. Carltun on the Park, Ltd
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Nassau County
Date published: Jul 30, 2009
Although S & S Hotel Ventures was based upon the now outdated Code of Professional Responsibility, New York's…
Farrell Family Ventures, LLC v. Sekas & Associates LLCThe Court would have granted defendants' disqualification motion under New York Rule of Professional Conduct…