From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lorence v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Apr 19, 2010
Civil No. 09-473 (DWF/SRN) (D. Minn. Apr. 19, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-473 (DWF/SRN).

April 19, 2010

Fay E. Fishman, Esq., Peterson Fishman, counsel for Plaintiff.

Lonnie F. Bryan, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, counsel for Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R R") of United States Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson. Defendant filed a response to the R R on April 13, 2010, (Doc. No. 33) stating he had no objections to the R R and Plaintiff filed a response to the R R on April 13, 2010 (Doc. No. 34), stating she had no objections to the R R.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Petition for Attorney's Fees (Doc. No. [25]) be GRANTED n part and DENIED in part, and that Plaintiff be awarded $9,094.27 in fees under the EAJA.


Summaries of

Lorence v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Apr 19, 2010
Civil No. 09-473 (DWF/SRN) (D. Minn. Apr. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Lorence v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Alison M. Lorence, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Apr 19, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-473 (DWF/SRN) (D. Minn. Apr. 19, 2010)

Citing Cases

Phillip v. Saul

At least in this circuit, it is generally accepted that "[t]he time spent developing an in forma pauperis…