Opinion
2013-05350
11-05-2014
In the Matter of Romulo LOPEZ, appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, et al., respondents.
Da'Tekena Barango–Tariah, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.
Da'Tekena Barango–Tariah, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.
Opinion In a proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights dated March 11, 2010, which dismissed the petitioner's administrative complaint, upon a finding that there was no probable cause to believe that the respondent Kraus Management, Inc., engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices in terminating his employment, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated January 4, 2011, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Where, as here, the New York State Division of Human Rights (hereinafter the NYSDHR) renders a determination of no probable cause without holding a hearing, the appropriate standard of review is whether the probable cause determination was arbitrary and capricious or lacking a rational basis (see Matter of Ramirez v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 4 N.Y.3d 789, 790, 795 N.Y.S.2d 164, 828 N.E.2d 80 ; Matter of Vora v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 103 A.D.3d 739, 739, 959 N.Y.S.2d 535 ; Matter of Orosz v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 88 A.D.3d 798, 930 N.Y.S.2d 288 ). As the NYSDHR's probable cause determination was not arbitrary and capricious or lacking a rational basis in the record, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding (see Matter of Knight v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 118 A.D.3d 791, 987 N.Y.S.2d 217 ).
DICKERSON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, SGROI and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.