From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Long Island Trading Corporation v. Tuthill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

January, 1935.


Order granting defendant's motion to open default in pleading, to vacate judgment entered by plaintiff, and granting leave to defendant to answer, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; the answer, if not already served, to be served within ten days from the entry of the order herein. Courts adopt a liberal policy in respect to defaults where it appears that there is an arguable defense and that the default did not arise by any willful act — to the end that parties may have their day in court to litigate the issues in difference between them. ( Allen v. Fink, 211 App. Div. 411; Baldwin v. Yellow Taxi Corporation, 221 id. 717.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Long Island Trading Corporation v. Tuthill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Long Island Trading Corporation v. Tuthill

Case Details

Full title:LONG ISLAND TRADING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. FRED H. TUTHILL, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1935

Citations

243 App. Div. 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Matter of Miller

" This pronouncement was cited and applied by the Appellate Division of this department in Long Island…

Matter of McCleary

The determination usually involves only the question of terms to be imposed in granting the order. ( Iger v.…