Opinion
Argued October 31, 1924 —
Decided March 16, 1925.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 2 N.J. Mis. R. 388.
For the respondent, Fast Fast.
For the appellant, Harry Levin.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.