From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loflin v. BMP Dev., LP

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Dec 9, 2020
432 S.C. 246 (S.C. 2020)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2019-001768 Opinion No. 28002

12-09-2020

William LOFLIN and Leslie Loflin, Respondents, v. BMP DEVELOPMENT, LP, Balsam Mountain Group, LLC, Coward, Hicks & Siler, P.A., J.K. Coward, Jr., Chicago Title Insurance Company, and Counsellor Title Agency, Inc., Defendants, Of which Chicago Title Insurance Company is Petitioner.

Louis H. Lang and Demetri K. Koutrakos, both of Callison Tighe & Robinson, LLC, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Ranee Saunders, of McGown, Hood & Felder, LLC, of Mt. Pleasant; and Daniel A. Speights and A. Gibson Solomons III, both of Speights & Solomons, LLC, of Hampton, all for Respondents.


Louis H. Lang and Demetri K. Koutrakos, both of Callison Tighe & Robinson, LLC, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Ranee Saunders, of McGown, Hood & Felder, LLC, of Mt. Pleasant; and Daniel A. Speights and A. Gibson Solomons III, both of Speights & Solomons, LLC, of Hampton, all for Respondents.

PER CURIAM:

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals’ decision in Loflin v. BMP Development, L.P. , 427 S.C. 580, 832 S.E.2d 294 (Ct. App. 2019). We adopt the court of appeals’ well-reasoned opinion reversing the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Chicago Title Insurance Company (Chicago). We modify the opinion only insofar as Chicago's challenge to the court of appeals’ finding concerning contractual incompetency. The two sentences in the court of appeals’ opinion referring to contractual incompetency are vacated. We therefore affirm the court of appeals’ decision as modified.

The court of appeals’ two references to contractual incompetency were: (1) "We also note this item covers incompetency, which would fit [the Loflins’] allegation that Balsam recorded the wrong plat, i.e., the December 10, 2001 plat, when it should have recorded the February 6, 2002 plat."; and (2) "Hence, the Preserve Road encroachment and [the Loflins’] loss in acreage fall within items 1, 3, and 14 of the Policy's ‘Covered Title Risks,’ i.e., ‘Someone else owns an interest in your title,’ ‘Forgery, fraud , duress, incompetency , incapacity, or impersonation,’ (emphases added) and ‘Other defects, liens, or encumbrances.’ " (Internal alteration marks omitted).
--------

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Loflin v. BMP Dev., LP

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Dec 9, 2020
432 S.C. 246 (S.C. 2020)
Case details for

Loflin v. BMP Dev., LP

Case Details

Full title:William Loflin and Leslie Loflin, Respondents, v. BMP Development, LP…

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Dec 9, 2020

Citations

432 S.C. 246 (S.C. 2020)
851 S.E.2d 713

Citing Cases

Wall v. Dye

See Loflin v. BMP Dev., LP, 427 S.C. 580, 588, 832 S.E.2d 294, 298-99 (Ct. App. 2019) (providing that…

Simmons v. Simmons

In this civil matter, Palmer Simmons, individually and as the Trustee of the Charles E. Simmons, Jr.…