Summary
finding that a person was not an interested party by virtue of being an employee of the defendant company
Summary of this case from Stephens v. CaruthersOpinion
No. 88-2561
March 8, 1989.
Appeal from the E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Locus v. Fayetteville State University
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 8, 1989
870 F.2d 655 (4th Cir. 1989)
Summaries of
Locus v. Fayetteville State University
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 8, 1989
870 F.2d 655 (4th Cir. 1989)
finding that a person was not an interested party by virtue of being an employee of the defendant company
Summary of this case from Stephens v. Caruthersrejecting plaintiff's argument that rule that a corporation could not conspire with itself should be limited to antitrust cases and dismissing a civil rights conspiracy claim
Summary of this case from Broussard v. Meineke Discount Shops, Inc.acknowledging application of the doctrine in the civil rights context
Summary of this case from Bailey v. Atl. Auto. Corp.Case details for
Locus v. Fayetteville State University
Case Details
Full title:Locus v. Fayetteville State University
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Date published: Mar 8, 1989
Citations
870 F.2d 655 (4th Cir. 1989)
Citing Cases
Ward v. Coastal Carolina Health Care, P.A.
Further, to the extent that plaintiff seeks relief from defendants Davis and Nuckolls for a conspiracy…
Veney v. OjedaFirst, plaintiff's claim fails under the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine because Officers Ojeda and Jones…