From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lock v. Torres

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Sep 14, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:14-CV-2766 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:14-CV-2766

09-14-2016

CHRISTOPHER LOCK, et al, Plaintiffs, v. CINDIA TORRES, et al, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court are the defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment. [Dkt. Nos. 59, 60.] On August 11, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") in this case, recommending that the motions be granted. [Dkt. No. 111.] The plaintiffs filed objections on August 25. [Dkt. No. 113.]

As 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) requires, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the portions of the R&R to which the plaintiffs objected. The Court agrees with the R&R's conclusions and reasoning. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the R&R and GRANTS the defendants' motions.

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED on this 14th day of September, 2016.

/s/_________

Kenneth M. Hoyt

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lock v. Torres

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Sep 14, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:14-CV-2766 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Lock v. Torres

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER LOCK, et al, Plaintiffs, v. CINDIA TORRES, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Sep 14, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:14-CV-2766 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 2016)