From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Local Union Textile Workers v. Commander Mills

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 22, 1938
77 P.2d 705 (Okla. 1938)

Opinion

No. 28306.

March 22, 1938.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Alleged Errors not Reviewed Where Transcript Fails to Show It Is Complete Record.

Where a transcript on appeal fails to show affirmatively that it contains a true, full and complete copy of all of the proceedings on the trial which are properly a part of the record, this court will not review the alleged errors.

Appeal from District Court, Tulsa County; Harry L.S. Halley, Judge.

Action for damages by Local Union Textile Workers No. 1840, on behalf of W. R. Bradfield et al. against Commander Mills, Inc. From order sustaining demurrer to the petition, plaintiff appeals. Dismissed.

W.R. Kerr, for plaintiff in error.

Coffey Coffey, for defendant in error.


This is an action for damages. The appeal is by transcript. A motion to dismiss has been filed on the ground that the certificate of the clerk is not sufficient. The certificate purports to certify that it contains a true and correct copy of certain pleadings filed in the cause. The appeal must be dismissed upon the following authorities: Schabel v. Wright, 179 Okla. 73, 64 P.2d 855; Render v. Dodson, 179 Okla. 352, 66 P.2d 14; Wade v. Mitchell, 14 Okla. 168, 79 P. 95; McGuire v. Rash, 89 Okla. 132, 214 P. 698; Thomas v. Potter, 164 Okla. 212, 23 P.2d 381.

The appeal is dismissed.

BAYLESS, V. C. J., and PHELPS, CORN, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Local Union Textile Workers v. Commander Mills

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 22, 1938
77 P.2d 705 (Okla. 1938)
Case details for

Local Union Textile Workers v. Commander Mills

Case Details

Full title:LOCAL UNION TEXTILE WORKERS NO. 1840 v. COMMANDER MILLS, Inc

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Mar 22, 1938

Citations

77 P.2d 705 (Okla. 1938)
77 P.2d 705