From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lo Bianco v. Cushing

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1936
182 A. 874 (N.J. 1936)

Opinion

Submitted October term, 1935.

Decided January 31st, 1936.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Egan, and reported in 117 N.J. Eq. 593.

Messrs. McCarter English ( Mr. Robert H. McCarter), for the complainant-respondent.

Mr. Thomas L. Hanson, Mr. George McElroy and Mr. Sam Weiss, for the defendants-appellants.


We agree with the conclusions reached by the vice-chancellor.

The decree below will be affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Lo Bianco v. Cushing

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1936
182 A. 874 (N.J. 1936)
Case details for

Lo Bianco v. Cushing

Case Details

Full title:SALVATORE LO BIANCO, complainant-respondent, v. GEORGE CUSHING et al.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 31, 1936

Citations

182 A. 874 (N.J. 1936)
182 A. 874

Citing Cases

Robinson v. Nick

interests are common may represent all members either as plaintiffs or defendants. Lilly v. Tobein, 103 Mo.…

Moore v. Local Union No. 483

The court held that no person has "any abstract right to be admitted" to membership in a voluntary…