Summary
declining to hold that "the ability to think and interact with others" was not a major life activity
Summary of this case from Howard v. Bureau of PrisonsOpinion
Civil Action No. 05-802.
May 30, 2007
ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2007, after the plaintiff, Karl Brett Lloyd, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a motion for summary judgment was submitted by the defendant and a motion for partial summary judgment was submitted by the plaintiff, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections and the response to those objections, and upon independent review of the motions and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment submitted on behalf of the defendant [Dkt. No. 26] is GRANTED, and the motion for partial summary judgment submitted on behalf of the plaintiff [Dkt. No. 30] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.