From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lloyd v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 22, 2016
Case No. 1:15-CV-485 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 22, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 1:15-CV-485

03-22-2016

Damon Shawn Lloyd, Petitioner, v. Warden, Chillecothe Correctional Institution, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner's objections to Magistrate Judge Wehrman's Report and Recommendation are not well-taken and are OVERRULED. On de novo review of the pleadings, briefs, and the report, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court finds that Judge Wehrman correctly concluded that Petitioner has filed a second or successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus that must be transferred to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for approval to consider it. To the extent the current petition seeks relief for errors allegedly committed in Petitioner's state post-conviction relief proceedings, those claims are not cognizable in § 2254 proceedings. Alley v. Bell, 307 F.3d 380, 386-87 (6th Cir. 2002).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Petitioner's objections to Magistrate Judge Wehrman's Report and Recommendation (Doc No. 19) are not well-taken and are OVERRULED. 2. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Doc. No. 17. Respondent's motion to transfer second or successive habeas petition to the Court of Appeals (Doc. No. 9) is well-taken and is GRANTED. 3. Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 4) is TRANSFERRED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for consideration of whether the District Court may review the motion in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b) and 2254. 4. A certificate of appealability shall not issue on the matters raised herein. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P.22(b). Petitioner remains free to request issuance of the certificate of appealability from the Court of Appeals. Id. 5. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore DENIES Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a); Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949, 952 (6th Cir. 1997). Date March 22, 2016

s/Sandra S. Beckwith

Sandra S. Beckwith

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lloyd v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 22, 2016
Case No. 1:15-CV-485 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Lloyd v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:Damon Shawn Lloyd, Petitioner, v. Warden, Chillecothe Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 22, 2016

Citations

Case No. 1:15-CV-485 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 22, 2016)

Citing Cases

Hood v. Perry

See e.g., Brown v. Warden, Lake Erie Corr. Inst., No. 1:11cv2765, 2014 WL 132367, at *17-18 (N.D. Ohio Jan.…