From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lloyd Capital Corporation v. Behrmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 4, 1986
122 A.D.2d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

August 4, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.).


Order affirmed, with costs.

We agree with Special Term that Republic Insurance Company (hereinafter Republic) has no standing, pursuant to CPLR 5015, to challenge the entry of the deficiency judgment entered in this mortgage foreclosure action. Republic is not an "interested person" (see, CPLR 5015) merely because, as a result of the deficiency judgment, it may be liable (under a fire insurance policy issued by it to the defendant Serge Behrmann), to the plaintiff as mortgagee of the subject premises and as an additional insured. Moreover, Republic was neither a "necessary party" pursuant to CPLR 1001, nor a "permissive party" pursuant to CPLR 1002, with respect to this mortgage foreclosure action (cf. Happell v Genoese, 35 Misc.2d 939; Chapman v Forbes, 123 N.Y. 532). Weinstein, J.P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lloyd Capital Corporation v. Behrmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 4, 1986
122 A.D.2d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Lloyd Capital Corporation v. Behrmann

Case Details

Full title:LLOYD CAPITAL CORPORATION, Respondent, v. SERGE BEHRMANN et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 4, 1986

Citations

122 A.D.2d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Clarendon Place v. Landmark

That Black may be collaterally estopped from contesting any adverse coverage ruling as a result of the…

NC Venture I, L.P. v. Complete Analysis, Inc.

In addition, while insurance proceeds may be potentially available to the plaintiff under the standard…