From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Llop v. National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 2, 1980
154 Ga. App. 504 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

59329.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 4, 1980.

DECIDED MAY 2, 1980.

Action on note. Fulton State Court. Before Judge Moran.

Morton P. Levine, for appellant.

Donald J. Goodman, for appellee.


The National Bank of Georgia (NBG) brought suit on a promissory note against appellant Llop. At the close of the evidence, the trial court granted a directed verdict in favor of NBG. Appellant cites as error the court's exclusion of testimony proffered to establish a parol agreement between the parties subsequent to the subject transaction. We affirm.

"Parol evidence shall be admissible ... to prove a new and distinct subsequent agreement [or] to enlarge the time ... of performance." Code § 38-507. "It, of course, goes without saying that an alleged subsequent agreement, like any other contract, is not binding if it is not supported by a legal consideration, but litigants sometimes get tripped up on this." Green, Ga. Law of Evidence, 491, § 216. Tatum v. Morgan, 108 Ga. 336 (2) ( 33 S.E. 940) (1899); J. E. M. Enterprises, Inc. v. Taco Pronto, Inc., 145 Ga. App. 573, 574 ( 244 S.E.2d 253) (1978).

Appellant made an offer of proof, attempting to show a subsequent parol agreement with NBG to the effect that he was no longer obligated to pay interest on the subject note and further that he did not have to pay the principal until the conclusion of certain federal litigation to which he was a party. As consideration therefore appellant recited his satisfaction of a separate, past-due obligation and certain token payments made on the subject note. This, however, was not enough, for "[a]n agreement on the part of one to do what he is already legally bound to do is not a sufficient consideration for the promise of another." Johnson v. Hinson, 188 Ga. 639 (2) ( 4 S.E.2d 561) (1939). Since NBG's promise to forego further interest and forbear collection was purely gratuitous, the trial court did not err in excluding evidence relating thereto. See Camp Camp v. Interstate Chemical Co., 18 Ga. App. 416 (4) ( 89 S.E. 491) (1916).

Judgment affirmed. McMurray, P. J., and Banke, J., concur.


SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 4, 1980 — DECIDED MAY 2, 1980.


Summaries of

Llop v. National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 2, 1980
154 Ga. App. 504 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Llop v. National Bank

Case Details

Full title:LLOP v. NATIONAL BANK OF GEORGIA

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 2, 1980

Citations

154 Ga. App. 504 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)
268 S.E.2d 777

Citing Cases

Trust Co. Bank of Augusta v. Christmas

" Clark v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., 185 Ga. App. 130, 136 (7b) ( 363 S.E.2d 813) (1987). See also…

Phillips v. Atlantic Bank c. Co.

Johnson v. Hinson, 188 Ga. 639 (2) ( 4 S.E.2d 561). See also Llop v. Nat. Bank of Ga., 154 Ga. App. 504 ( 268…